JPEPA #1:Introduction to The Japanese-Philippine Economic Partnership Agreement

In the past weeks there have been clamor for a better transparency on Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (JPEPA), the agreement between the Japanese and Philippine Government. Despite coverage, we still would like to revisit this important agreement and why it needs the close scrutiny of the Filipino people as well as the public and private sectors.

The main concern between this agreement is that it opens the door to the illegal dumping of toxic waste and other garbage into the Philippine territory. You may already know of an incident that has happened before, in which a company was convicted for trying to smuggle garbage into the Philippines.

The precedent is there, and now the Government is hastily trying to push this down the throat of the Filipino People. However! and this is a big However, we strongly applaud the media coverage around the web and including the other media outlets in Asia and in particluar the Philiippines. Because of this coverage, the eyes of every writer, politician, blogger (such as myself) have been opened and hopefully the right decision in the senate can be made.

This is our first article on this important agreement, and we will provide you this series as an update on the situation. You can find the copy in pdf format here.

JPEPA has gone a long way from its slow start back in 2002 until it was signed last September.

One of the most disturbing fact of this situation is that copies were only furnished only after signing the agreement. Here is a snippet of an article that the Philippine Daily Inquirer wrote regarding the timeline of JPEPA:

Sept. 11, 2006 — DTI furnishes Congress with copies of the JPEPA on the first working day after the treaty was signed. It also uploaded the text of the JPEPA in its website

You can see the entire timeline here to get a better understanding at the road to this “below-the-radar” agreement.

Also, here is an excellent overview to the JPEPA:

Brouhaha Over Basura (by Perry Diaz)

On September 9, 2006, at the Asia-Europe People’s Forum in Helsinki, Finland, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and then Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi signed the Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (JPEPA). The comprehensive free trade agreement — the first bilateral trade treaty since the parity agreement with the U.S. in 1946 — would be a big boost to the Philippine Economy. Among the items agreed upon is the employment of nurses and caregivers in Japan. In return, however, the Philippines would allow the entry of toxic and hazardous waste to be dumped on Philippine soil.

Philippine environmentalists pointed out that one of the hazardous waste materials allowed is the highly toxic incinerator ash which is banned by the Basel Convention of which the Philippines and Japan are signatories. The Basel Convention does not allow the exportation of toxic materials to another country unless the government of that country approves it. However, both the Philippines and Japan have not ratified the more stringent Basel Ban amendment which banned trading of all hazardous waste including those that are labeled — or mislabeled — for recycling.

Why the Philippine negotiators at the Helsinki confab allowed this to happen is beyond reason. It’s either they’re stupid or ignorant of Philippine law. Republic Act 6969, known as Toxic Substances, Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes Control Act, which was enacted in 1990, declares: It is the policy of the State to regulate, restrict or prohibit the importation, manufacture, processing, sale, distribution, use and disposal of chemical substances and mixtures that present unreasonable risk and/or injury to health or the environment, to prohibit the entry, even in transit, of hazardous and nuclear wastes and their disposal into Philippine territorial limits for whatever purpose. Clearly, the yet-to-be-ratified JPEPA is a violation of Philippine law.

In 2000, four Filipinos representing a firm that imported tons of toxic waste from Japan were sued by the Philippine government. Sinsei Enterprises Inc., the Manila-based partner of a Japanese firm, Nisso Ltd., was suspected of shipping hazardous waste to the Philippines. According to the lawsuit, 122 containers arrived in Manila on July 22, 1999, and were declared to contain 80% recyclable waste paper and 20% plastic. The illegal shipment was cleared when it left Japan.

However, an inspection of the cargo upon its arrival in Manila revealed hospital waste materials piled under adult diapers, candy wrappers, used sanitary napkins, aluminum foil and noodle cups. Customs inspectors and reporters present during the inspection said that the “smell was so bad that those present threw up and moved away from the containers. The containers were shipped back to Japan and the Japanese government paid for the expenses. The four accused Filipinos mysteriously disappeared and are still at large today.

Are we looking at the tip of a stinking iceberg here? How rampant is the smuggling of hazardous waste in the Philippines? Recently, an investigation by Greenpeace International revealed a massive flow of automobile lead-acid batteries from industrialized countries to Third World countries including the Philippines.

Greenpeace reported that the end result of this free trade in toxic waste is the suffering of thousands of workers and children from lead blood poisoning, rivers and air loaded with lead emissions, and big profits for the lead battery brokers and manufacturers. Other toxic waste being dumped in the Philippines are waste oil from South Korea and electronic waste from various countries.

Compounding the illegal importation of toxic waste is the Philippines’ inability — the Philippines has no recycling industry — to dispose or treat its own hazardous waste which is estimated at more than 2.5 million tons a year. Garbage dumps like Payatas in Quezon City are the repository of all kinds of waste including hazardous material. With the anticipated importation of toxic waste from Japan, the health of future generations of Filipinos would be compromised.

Under JPEPA, the Philippines is allowed to export its toxic waste to Japan. But who in Japan would buy them? Japanese society has for centuries branded and isolated waste-handlers, butchers, tanners, and executioners. They are called Burakumin — the “untouchables. They lived in isolated villages called Buraku — there are 4,000 such villages today. They are placed at the lowest social rank — Eta (extreme filth) or Hinin (non-human).

They are considered polluted and are not allowed to move out of their Buraku. Today, there are 1.17 million Burakumin. It is no wonder that Japan is eager to export its toxic waste — handling waste is taboo in their society.

India’s caste system has similarity to Japan. They, too, have untouchables — the Harijan. People who work in unclean occupations — similar to the Burakumin — are looked upon as polluting people. In some regions, even a contact with their shadow was considered as polluting. If someone comes in contact with an untouchable, that person is defiled and has to immerse or wash himself or herself with water to be purified. In 1949, the use of the term “untouchable became illegal and discrimination against them became illegal as well. However, the social stigma against the more than 60 million untouchables remains. One untouchable — K.R. Narayanan — broke this social barrier and became the President of India in 1997.

With the brouhaha over toxic waste — basura — the Philippine Senate indicated that it would scrutinize the trade agreement with Japan. In reaction to the furor, the Japanese embassy in Manila reassured the Philippine government that they would export toxic waste only if the Philippine government approves it.

What was once a Paradise called the Pearl of the Orient Seas, the Philippines is becoming to be the garbage dump of the world — a Payatas on a global scale. Are we going to be the new untouchables of the world? There is still time to reverse this massive destruction of our environment. The government has to renegotiate the trade treaty with Japan and remove toxic and hazardous waste as exportable items. And it must also ratify the Basel Ban amendment. It’s time that the government cleans up its act and enforce the Toxic Substances Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes Control Act. As the saying goes, Cleanliness is next to godliness.

(Much appreciation to Perry for his support)

To our informed contributors, we appreciate your comments and/or contributions regarding this issue. If you have further information regarding JPEPA, you may email them to us using our “Contact Form”, register for a an account, or email us directly at nick [at] tingog [dot] com to contribute your articles.

This is still an ongoing issue, so stay tuned.

tags:

Related Entries:
How Do You Say JPEPA?
JPEPA #5: Pimentel and Madrigal Submits Resolution on JPEPA
JPEPA #2: Cayetano: JPEPA to Face Rough Sailing in The Senate
JPEPA #4: ROXAS: SENATE TRADE COMMITTEE TO MEET ON JPEPA
JPEPA #3: Palace to Review JPEPA on Toxic Wastes
NBN, JPEPA, And The Dictatorship Tool of Executive Agreement
DOJ Says Broadband Deal Legal, Big Is Beautiful, And Super Regions Next?
Smith Returned to US Custody
This Day in Philippines History [November 27]
Spratlys, China, Oil, NBN, Executive Agreement, and Corruption

One Response to “JPEPA #1:Introduction to The Japanese-Philippine Economic Partnership Agreement”

  1. […] Introduction to JPEPA 2. Cayetano: JPEPA to Face Rough Sailing in The Senate 3. Palace To Review JPEPA on Toxic Wastes 4. […]

Leave a Reply